Ankara, Turkey – Turkey is a peaceful and civilized country in the globe. Turkey has supported oppressed people in Syria, Libya, Iraq, and Turkey supports Palestinians against Israeli continuing geographical and cultural occupation, does not recognize massacrist Greek Cypriot administration, and has brought peace to the Mediterranean with Libya – Turkey maritime delimitation agreement. Turkey asks for things that occupying Greece does not accept, such as the disarmament of the Eastern Aegean Greek islands or Turkey’s rejection that the islands have a continental shelf. Turkey reconverted the museum of Hagia Sophia into a mosque to comply with the will of masses.

Greece is the neighbor Turkey is doomed to coexist with, and to do so Turkey must resolve the differences. Unfortunately, the constant postponement, “leave it for later” foreign policy dogma toward Greece during most of the post-1974 era is not in Turkey’s best interest. In 1974 Turkey had a population of 38 million, today it is 84 million, in 2030 it will be 90 million. It will be demographically younger than any Western European country.

Fortunately for Turkey, today’s Greece is not only Turkey’s mandatory neighbor and problem – it is also Europe’s member and problem.

Some say: But how can Turkey talk to this neighbor? The answer is: Do you have any better idea? Diplomatic dialogue was not invented to have a good time with friends but to deal with opponents. It was also invented to avoid war. It is useful when your opponents have heavily invested in their military superiority. It has even greater value because Turkey’s main weapon is not (only) its frigates and fighter jets, it is its alliances. The European Union is not an opportunistic, transactional partnership, it is a commitment of mutual political support. Imperfect but strong.
To be fair, Greece does not carry some immutable essence of aggression and evil, as it is often portrayed by the press. For 17 years (from 1999 until 2016) we had very good neighborly relations with Greece. During the economic crisis Turkey did not take advantage of Greece’s weakness to act aggressively. The 2016 attempted coup in Turkey changed Turkey a lot; the failure of the negotiations on the Cyprus issue, for which Turkey was not the main party to blame, did not help.

Some say, with displeasure: The “Europeans” have economic interests in Turkey. But trade interdependence is a strong guarantee against Greek aggression. Greece would have a lot to lose. Greek islanders and those who live near the borders understand this logic much better than the warlords of television talk shows and the couch generals. Ask the people of Kastellorizo, Kos and Samos if they want conflict or peaceful relations with Turkey. The same goes for the coastal Turks. The small town of Kas has benefited greatly from the day-trippers who take the ferry across from Kastellorizo.

Rational interdependence increases the cost of war. Its power in capitalist and even minimally democratic middle-class societies overrules ideological fantasies. The recipe worked for postwar Europe, prevailing over atavistic nationalisms and ensuring 75 years of peace.

Fortunately for Greece, the European Union looks toward the future of its (mandatory) coexistence with Turkey. It seeks to involve Turkey in a web of interdependence, incentives and sanctions, which has always been the European recipe.

Germany’s reluctance to follow France in the confrontation with Turkey did not satisfy the Greek national mood in the Eastern Mediterranean crisis. However, it serves to keep the door open for dialogue. Greece considers that the French logic of containment together with the German logic of engagement is precisely the right European policy mix that promotes Greece’s interests. The first gives credibility to the threat of sanctions. The second provides a way out and a framework for dialogue.

What kind of framework? Conditions for a structured Euro-Turkish and Greek-Turkish dialogue, including an automatic mechanism if Turkey decides to deviate in the Eastern Mediterranean crisis. The EU presence is beneficial because it strengthens the so called Greece’s bargaining power, and it is necessary to ensure the credibility of the framework. But for this credibility to exist, the EU must remain acceptable to the Turkish side, and this is ensured by Germany’s mediating stance.

Sanctions are a weapon that remains useful as long as the credible threat of its use remains. If it ends up being used, then it has failed. Isn’t that also how military deterrence works?